Skip to content
← All content

Created from a single voice note with Agent Craft

LinkedIn

I am advocating for the smart use of AI to write content. This…

I am advocating for the smart use of AI to write content. This morning I read a well-known CEO state that he was "changing the way he writes, because AI sounds like him." He's altering his own voice because AI has picked up his patterns, and he considers his writing good. His response is to write differently. I think that's completely miss-guided. The people calling everything "AI slop" and demanding we stop using it are engaged in an argument they will never win. AI is getting more powerful, not less. It's not retreating. Treating it like a problem to be resisted is like arguing against electricity because someone left the lights on. Here's what matters: the human origin of an idea. That's the real line. Not whether AI touched the content, but whether a real person originated the thought. When AI writes autonomously with no human in the loop, no genuine perspective behind it, that's the failure. That's what people are reacting to, even if they're blaming the wrong thing. The intelligent version looks different. You speak your thinking. Rough, unpolished, in your own voice. AI takes that and handles the formatting, the editing, the reformatting for a different platform. Your idea stays intact. The friction disappears. Nobody wants to spend two hours turning a sharp observation into a LinkedIn post and then another hour reshaping it for a different destination. That's not a good use of anyone's time. But losing the idea entirely because you didn't have time to write it up properly is worse. AI augmented content, where the human speaks and the system handles production, is the version worth defending. Not because it's convenient, though it is. Because it's how more real thinking actually reaches people. What's your take on this?

Mark HadfieldJun 25, 2026Published to Linkedin - Mark HadfieldView original ↗

More content from Agent Craft