Created from a single voice note with Agent Craft
Two camps have formed around AI content, and most people have already…
Two camps have formed around AI content, and most people have already picked a side. One says the tools strip out personality. Flat, generic, obviously machine-made. The other says the tech caught up and the old complaints don't hold anymore. The prevailing assumption in the market is still that AI content feels hollow. That's the majority view. Here's where the two camps actually agree, even if they'd never admit it: nobody wants to talk to a machine. The disagreement is only about whether AI can preserve a real human origin or whether it flattens everything into sameness. The way Agent Craft sees it, AI is genuinely good at the grunt work. The tedious parts. The drafting, the reformatting, the posting cadence nobody enjoys. What it can't manufacture is the human layer that makes a piece land with the person reading it. That connection has to start with a real person. So the question isn't whether AI writes decent sentences. It clearly can. The question is where the human belongs in the process. Some teams put a person at the very start and let the tool build from there. Others let the tool run and drop a human in at review. Which camp are you in? Do you think AI content still reads flat, or have the tools closed the gap on personality?
More content from Agent Craft
- LinkedInI am experimenting with a new feature for Agent Craft. It’s really simple: I think that comments, likes and shares are antiquated. I think we could create a much more useful feedback mechanism for everyone using simple voice notes (just like Agent Craft helps create content). If you have been reading my content and have some feedback for me, record your thoughts here. mark.agentcraft.me/feedback I will report back soon on the results and show a video of the full feature on my end so you can see how it all works.
- X (Twitter)Same influencer budget. 300% more usable assets. One contract clause: small blanket licensing fee upfront, shift to micros under 5k. Costs stayed low. Everything else scaled. Juan Mouton, Fractional CMO preparing you for Series A Personal Brand Powered by Agent Craft
- TikTokCoding 12-15 hours a day? The most productive thing you can do is step away from the screen. Your brain keeps working even when you're not at your desk. #entrepreneurship #buildinpublic #productivity #founders #startuplife #mindset
- X (Twitter)Breadth kills reach. Everything you believe about staying versatile is quietly making you invisible. You have to fight your own instinct for it. Pick the box or stay invisible. Juan Mouton, Fractional CMO preparing you for Series A Personal Brand Powered by Agent Craft
- LinkedInLinkedIn's AI crisis is going to resolve itself, just not the way LinkedIn thinks it will. The facts are undeniable. AI written content and comments are up enormously. Engagement is down because nobody wants to read ideas that did not originate from a human. And yet the people complaining are all using Claude themselves. Content creation has gone through a visible arc. Everyone wrote manually, then Claude arrived and authenticity collapsed. People called it AI slop and hated it (while all using it to write themselves). Now there is a gap between two things nobody wants: writing manually and publishing slop. LinkedIn is drowning in the middle of it. LinkedIn's response is misguided and doomed to fail. Their slop-flagging mechanism guarantees false positives and negatives at an unacceptably high rate. And here is the contradiction that should embarrass them: they are blocking accounts for AI signals while simultaneously rolling out their own native AI writing tools. You cannot win both sides of that argument. The real problem is not AI. It is inauthenticity. If AI content is near impossible to reliably detect, then what the pushback really reveals is a warranted dislike of content with no human idea at its core. The distinction matters. AI generating your content autonomously is slop, period. But if your thoughts are at the heart of it and AI is reformatting and distributing them, that is a productivity enhancement. Nobody wants to hear from a machine. Humans have to remain the origin. There is a format that solves this problem almost completely. Video. You cannot easily fake a human being on camera. That is not a theory. Look at TikTok. It became the most culturally significant platform on the planet on the back of short, raw, human video. People trust what they can see. If LinkedIn genuinely wanted to solve its authenticity crisis, it would be throwing everything behind video. Instead, its algorithm deprioritises video reach compared to text posts. Read that again. The platform drowning in AI-written text is actively suppressing the one format that is hardest to fake. That is a failure in logic. AI use is only going to grow. That train has long since left the station. The real question is not whether people will use it. It is how to keep real human insight at the centre of what gets published. Video is one of the most powerful ways to do that. That is the only version of this that ends well for LinkedIn, for creators, and for anyone who still believes ideas are worth something. How do you think LinkedIn should navigate this over the next two years?
- ThreadsHere's where most AI content tools go wrong: they hand you a blank prompt box and make you iterate until you're sick of it. Agent Craft loads your brand voice, strategy, and campaign goals in first. So the first draft is already aligned, not the fortieth.