Created from a single voice note with Agent Craft
TikTokAlso on X (Twitter) and YouTube
Coding 12-15 hours a day? The most productive thing you can do is…
Coding 12-15 hours a day? The most productive thing you can do is step away from the screen. Your brain keeps working even when you're not at your desk. #entrepreneurship #buildinpublic #productivity #founders #startuplife #mindset
Mark HadfieldAug 9, 2026Published to X (Twitter), YouTube and TikTok
More content from Agent Craft
- X (Twitter)Same influencer budget. 300% more usable assets. One contract clause: small blanket licensing fee upfront, shift to micros under 5k. Costs stayed low. Everything else scaled. Juan Mouton, Fractional CMO preparing you for Series A Personal Brand Powered by Agent Craft
- X (Twitter)Breadth kills reach. Everything you believe about staying versatile is quietly making you invisible. You have to fight your own instinct for it. Pick the box or stay invisible. Juan Mouton, Fractional CMO preparing you for Series A Personal Brand Powered by Agent Craft
- LinkedInLinkedIn's AI crisis is going to resolve itself, just not the way LinkedIn thinks it will. The facts are undeniable. AI written content and comments are up enormously. Engagement is down because nobody wants to read ideas that did not originate from a human. And yet the people complaining are all using Claude themselves. Content creation has gone through a visible arc. Everyone wrote manually, then Claude arrived and authenticity collapsed. People called it AI slop and hated it (while all using it to write themselves). Now there is a gap between two things nobody wants: writing manually and publishing slop. LinkedIn is drowning in the middle of it. LinkedIn's response is misguided and doomed to fail. Their slop-flagging mechanism guarantees false positives and negatives at an unacceptably high rate. And here is the contradiction that should embarrass them: they are blocking accounts for AI signals while simultaneously rolling out their own native AI writing tools. You cannot win both sides of that argument. The real problem is not AI. It is inauthenticity. If AI content is near impossible to reliably detect, then what the pushback really reveals is a warranted dislike of content with no human idea at its core. The distinction matters. AI generating your content autonomously is slop, period. But if your thoughts are at the heart of it and AI is reformatting and distributing them, that is a productivity enhancement. Nobody wants to hear from a machine. Humans have to remain the origin. There is a format that solves this problem almost completely. Video. You cannot easily fake a human being on camera. That is not a theory. Look at TikTok. It became the most culturally significant platform on the planet on the back of short, raw, human video. People trust what they can see. If LinkedIn genuinely wanted to solve its authenticity crisis, it would be throwing everything behind video. Instead, its algorithm deprioritises video reach compared to text posts. Read that again. The platform drowning in AI-written text is actively suppressing the one format that is hardest to fake. That is a failure in logic. AI use is only going to grow. That train has long since left the station. The real question is not whether people will use it. It is how to keep real human insight at the centre of what gets published. Video is one of the most powerful ways to do that. That is the only version of this that ends well for LinkedIn, for creators, and for anyone who still believes ideas are worth something. How do you think LinkedIn should navigate this over the next two years?
- ThreadsHere's where most AI content tools go wrong: they hand you a blank prompt box and make you iterate until you're sick of it. Agent Craft loads your brand voice, strategy, and campaign goals in first. So the first draft is already aligned, not the fortieth.
- BlueskyOne voice note. 45,000 impressions on LinkedIn. That's the reach an executive gets when the content sounds like them and not an ad. Audiences follow people six times more often than company pages, and the human voice is what turns a follow into commercial trust.
- FacebookTwo ways to make AI content. One works. The other keeps you stuck in a revision loop you'll grow to hate. Way one: paste a prompt, read the draft, fix what's off, paste again, repeat. You're the editor now. The tool guesses at your voice every single time because it knows nothing about you, your goals, or the campaign the post belongs to. Ten rounds later you have something passable and a wasted afternoon. Way two flips the order. Before a single post gets written, the brand voice, the DNA, the strategy, and the campaign goals are all loaded in. So when content gets generated, it pulls from every piece of that context at once. The first draft already sounds like you and already points at the goal. Nine times out of ten there's nothing to iterate on. That's the difference between a tool and a workflow, and it's why one exec told us he can't reliably tell his own writing apart from what Agent Craft produced for his personal brand. The setup does the heavy lifting so you don't. Which side of that would you rather live on?